Go Back   Political Fray > The Political Fray > News & Current Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-05-2010, 04:12 PM   Report this post #1
myp myp is offline
Founding Father

myp's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,363
'usa' 'us new york'

France to commit 80 more troops to NATO forces in Afghanistan, far below expectations


France announced today that it would contribute 80 troops to NATO forces in Afghanistan. The news came as a disappoint to some countries, namely the US, which expected around 1000. France was expected to contribute more in light of troop removals from Kosovo, but French President Nicholas Sarkozy is facing political pressure due to growing French casualties.

Full story here: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...hatsNewsSecond

Thoughts?

_________________________________________________________
"I may not agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it" -Voltaire/Hall
PF on Facebook - PF News Aggregator (beta version)
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 04:14 PM   Report this post #2
deanhills deanhills is offline
Secretary of State

deanhills's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by myp View Post
France announced today that it would contribute 80 troops to NATO forces in Afghanistan. The news came as a disappoint to some countries, namely the US, which expected around 1000. France was expected to contribute more in light of troop removals from Kosovo, but French President Nicholas Sarkozy is facing political pressure due to growing French casualties.

Full story here: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...hatsNewsSecond

Thoughts?
I'm confused. I thought they already had troops in Afghanistan, so does this then mean 80 additional troops?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 04:17 PM   Report this post #3
myp myp is offline
Founding Father

myp's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,363
'usa' 'us new york'
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanhills View Post
I'm confused. I thought they already had troops in Afghanistan, so does this then mean 80 additional troops?
Yes, this was for additional troops committed to the NATO forces, which are under the control of U.S. Gen. Stanley McChrystal.

_________________________________________________________
"I may not agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it" -Voltaire/Hall
PF on Facebook - PF News Aggregator (beta version)
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 04:27 PM   Report this post #4
deanhills deanhills is offline
Secretary of State

deanhills's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by myp View Post
Yes, this was for additional troops committed to the NATO forces, which are under the control of U.S. Gen. Stanley McChrystal.
This is probably going to sound a little glib, but for me it is probably a bonus to have less than more French troops. Towards the end of 2008 when they had to take over a post that had been vacated by the Italians, they assumed that it was a harmless post, because the Italians did not have much along the lines of engagement in the area. What had happened, without the French knowledge is that the Italians had paid some of the Taliban lords to be at peace. So when they left, they forgot to tell the French, and the French did not do any of their homework properly. I believe the Americans warned the French, they did not listen, and quite a number of French soldiers died as a consequence. Think the war effort in Afghanistan would be better off without the French and the Italians. Given this major bloomer. Source
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 07:15 PM   Report this post #5
David David is online now
Governor

David's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kissimmee
Posts: 1,440
'usa' 'us florida'
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanhills View Post
This is probably going to sound a little glib, but for me it is probably a bonus to have less than more French troops. Towards the end of 2008 when they had to take over a post that had been vacated by the Italians, they assumed that it was a harmless post, because the Italians did not have much along the lines of engagement in the area. What had happened, without the French knowledge is that the Italians had paid some of the Taliban lords to be at peace. So when they left, they forgot to tell the French, and the French did not do any of their homework properly. I believe the Americans warned the French, they did not listen, and quite a number of French soldiers died as a consequence. Think the war effort in Afghanistan would be better off without the French and the Italians. Given this major bloomer. Source
What do you expect from the French?

_________________________________________________________
The people are the government, administering it by their agents; they are the government, the sovereign power. -- President Andrew Jackson
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 07:18 PM   Report this post #6
GOP GOP is offline
Representative

GOP's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 360
'uk'
Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
What do you expect from the French?
My thoughts exactly! I don't really see the use of them in NATO at all.

_________________________________________________________
A world without nuclear weapons would be less stable and more dangerous for all of us. - Margaret Thatcher
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 07:25 PM   Report this post #7
deanhills deanhills is offline
Secretary of State

deanhills's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
What do you expect from the French?
Their best contribution would be no contribution. Alll they do is to distract other people who are better prepared especially as far as safety and security is concerned. Ditto Italians.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 07:29 PM   Report this post #8
GOP GOP is offline
Representative

GOP's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 360
'uk'
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanhills View Post
Their best contribution would be no contribution. Alll they do is to distract other people who are better prepared especially as far as safety and security is concerned. Ditto Italians.
I am actually rather found of the Italians. Silvio Berlusconi for some reason fascinates me. But I think Italians just wants to live their own lives on their boot!

But the French on the other hand, I view them as arrogant to both the United States and Britain.

_________________________________________________________
A world without nuclear weapons would be less stable and more dangerous for all of us. - Margaret Thatcher
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 08:51 PM   Report this post #9
David David is online now
Governor

David's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kissimmee
Posts: 1,440
'usa' 'us florida'
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOP View Post
I am actually rather found of the Italians. Silvio Berlusconi for some reason fascinates me. But I think Italians just wants to live their own lives on their boot!

But the French on the other hand, I view them as arrogant to both the United States and Britain.
We should of let the Germans keep them after the war.

_________________________________________________________
The people are the government, administering it by their agents; they are the government, the sovereign power. -- President Andrew Jackson
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 08:56 PM   Report this post #10
GOP GOP is offline
Representative

GOP's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 360
'uk'
Haha, well I am sure Europe wouldn't really have been the same without an independent France either.

_________________________________________________________
A world without nuclear weapons would be less stable and more dangerous for all of us. - Margaret Thatcher
  Reply With Quote
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2009-2010 PoliticalFray.com